Last edited by Tojabar
Wednesday, July 29, 2020 | History

1 edition of Prohibiting obscene animal crush videos in the wake of United States v. Stevens found in the catalog.

Prohibiting obscene animal crush videos in the wake of United States v. Stevens

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary

Prohibiting obscene animal crush videos in the wake of United States v. Stevens

hearing before the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, second session, September 15, 2010

by United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary

  • 311 Want to read
  • 26 Currently reading

Published by U.S. G.P.O., For sale by the Supt. of Docs., U.S. G.P.O. in Washington .
Written in English

    Subjects:
  • Law and legislation,
  • Freedom of speech,
  • Paraphilias,
  • Animal welfare,
  • Video recordings

  • Edition Notes

    SeriesS. hrg -- 111-875
    Classifications
    LC ClassificationsKF26 .J8 2010n
    The Physical Object
    Paginationiii, 102 p. ;
    Number of Pages102
    ID Numbers
    Open LibraryOL24864946M
    ISBN 100160884772
    ISBN 109780160884771
    LC Control Number2011388940
    OCLC/WorldCa708396796

    decision in United States v. Stevens, S. Ct. (), United States v. New Orleans Book Mart, Inc., F.2d 73 (5th Cir. ) Prohibiting Obscene Animal Crush Videos in the Wake of United States v. Stevens: Hearing Before the S. Comm. On the Judiciary.   In United States v. Stevens, the Supreme Court struck down the law Congress passed on narrow grounds, finding that the federal law was overbroad because it could be interpreted to apply to many unintended circumstances, including hunting videos. The Court did not say that depictions of extreme animal cruelty are protected by the First.

    Crush videos are recordings which typically depict women in stilettos or bare feet literally crushing, stomping on, or impaling small, helpless animals to satisfy the bizarre sexual fetishes of sadistic viewers. The Animal Welfare Institute is vehemently opposed to "crush videos" and has supported federal legislation intended to stop the trade in these films in the US. "Prohibiting Obscene Animal Crush Videos in the Wake of United States v. Stevens." Oral Testimony. Written testimony on "Prohibiting Obscene Animal Crush Videos in the Wake of United States vs. Stevens". with N. Rocklin. United States Senate .

    Media Organizations in Support of Respondent, at 22, United States v. Stevens, S. Ct. () (No. 08–) (‘‘Congress could have regulated legally obscene crush videos in a manner that did not threaten news reporting and other high-value speech.’’); Brief of Amicus Curiae Na-. On Thursday, December 9th, , President Obama signed into law, Congressman Elton Gallegly’s initiative to ban animal crush videos in the Unites States of America. Through grass roots efforts, both here and abroad, people united to make a last minute push in order to pressure the United States Senate to pass the Animal Crush Prohibition Act.


Share this book
You might also like
Space shuttle 1976

Space shuttle 1976

The Enigma

The Enigma

Capitalist solutions

Capitalist solutions

Beware the bog girl

Beware the bog girl

Iron ore deposits and banded iron formations of India

Iron ore deposits and banded iron formations of India

Department of Health, Education, and Welfares budget for fiscal year 1979

Department of Health, Education, and Welfares budget for fiscal year 1979

Spatial analysis

Spatial analysis

Determinants of Defense Budget Process in Post-Communist Poland

Determinants of Defense Budget Process in Post-Communist Poland

James Denny.

James Denny.

vestry book and accounts of the churchwardens of St. Marys Leicester, 1652-1729.

vestry book and accounts of the churchwardens of St. Marys Leicester, 1652-1729.

atlas of Russia and East European history [by] Arthur E. Adams, Ian M. Matley, and William O. McCagg.

atlas of Russia and East European history [by] Arthur E. Adams, Ian M. Matley, and William O. McCagg.

geologic approach to artificial recharge site selection in the Fresno-Clovis area, California

geologic approach to artificial recharge site selection in the Fresno-Clovis area, California

The U.S.A. in the world economy.

The U.S.A. in the world economy.

Daring to be different

Daring to be different

doctrine of warranty of seaworthiness

doctrine of warranty of seaworthiness

Official directory

Official directory

Lets go down the Mississippi with La Salle.

Lets go down the Mississippi with La Salle.

Prohibiting obscene animal crush videos in the wake of United States v. Stevens by United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary Download PDF EPUB FB2

“Prohibiting Obscene Animal Crush Videos in the Wake of United States v. Stevens” Septem Written Testimony of Kevin Volkan, Chair & Professor of Psychology, California State University Channel Islands, Camarillo, CA Thank you, Mr.

Chairman and Members of the Committee, for inviting me here today to testify. U.S. Stevens. In United States v. Stevens, the Supreme Court struck down § 48 on very narrow grounds, finding that the federal law was overbroad because it could be interpreted to apply to many unintended circumstances, including hunting videos that had some redeeming social value.

Slip Op. at 11–   Get this from a library. Prohibiting obscene animal crush videos in the wake of United States v. Stevens: hearing before the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, second session, Septem [United States.

Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary.]. PROHIBITING OBSCENE ANIMAL CRUSH VIDEOS IN THE WAKE OF UNITED STATES v.

STEVENS. Date(s) Held: th Congress, 2nd Session. GPO Document Source: CHRGshrg Superintendents of Documents ID: Y 4.J 89/2. Witnesses: Perry, Nancy, Vice President for Government Affairs, The Humane Society of the United States, Washington, DC.

PROHIBITING OBSCENE ANIMAL CRUSH VID-EOS IN THE WAKE OF UNITED STATES V. STEVENS WEDNESDAY, SEPTEM U.S. SENATE, COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY, Washington, DC. The Committee met, pursuant to notice, at 10 a.m., in room SD–Dirksen Senate Office Building, Hon. Jon Kyl, presiding.

Present: Senator Kyl. OPENING STATEMENT OF HON. ACLU Statement for Senate Judicay Hearing on Prohibiting Obscene Animal Crush Videos in the Wake of United States v.

Stevens. United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary. You are currently searching within the Prohibiting Obscene Animal Crush Videos in the Wake of United States v. Stevens section.

Earlier this month, Senator Kyl chaired a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing entitled "Prohibiting Obscene Animal Crush Videos in the Wake of United States v.

Stevens," that featured the testimony of Nancy Perry, Vice President for Government Affairs at the Human Society of the United States, and Dr. Kevin Volkan, Chair & Professor of the. An illustration of an open book. Books. An illustration of two cells of a film strip.

Video An illustration of an audio speaker. Full text of "PROHIBITING OBSCENE ANIMAL CRUSH VIDEOS IN THE WAKE OF UNITED STATES v. STEVENS" See other formats. The United States has a long history of prohibiting the interstate sale, marketing, advertising, exchange, and distribution of obscene material and speech that is integral to criminal conduct.

“(2) The Federal Government and the States have a compelling interest in preventing intentional acts of extreme animal. Sept. 15, – The Senate Judiciary Committee holds a hearing titled “Prohibiting Obscene Animal Crush Videos in the Wake of United States v. Stevens” called by Chairman Leahy and presided over by Senator Kyl.

The committee takes testimony from HSUS Vice President of Government Affairs Nancy Perry and from Dr. Kevin Volkan, a psychology. This finding just further confirms Congress's understanding that the phrase "animal crush videos" refers to a narrow subcategory of depictions of animal cruelty that are prurient and obscene.

The Supreme Court in Roth v. United States, U.S. n. 20 () defined prurient as "a shameful or morbid interest in nudity, sex, or excretion. In any case, the above URL for the Volkan testimony doesn't seem to be active anymore; the Internet Archive has a copy at copy here ("Written Testimony of Kevin Volkan - Prohibiting Obscene Animal Crush Videos in the Wake of United States v.

Stevens"). Jimw15 March (UTC). The Senate Committee on the Judiciary has scheduled a hearing entitled “Prohibiting Obscene Animal Crush Videos in the Wake of United States s” for Wednesday at 10 a.m. Ths is an outgrowth of the U.S.

Stevens case, in which NSSF submitted an amicus brief and sounded the alarm about the case to the conservation world and outdoor writers. Email this Article Crush film. United States v. Stevens, U.S. () Prohibiting Obscene Animal Crush Videos in the Wake of United States v.

Stevens: Hearing Before the S. Comm. on the Judiciary, th Cong. () end to the market in animal crush videos and prevent the abuse to animals.

Prohibiting Obscene Animal Crush Videos in the Wake of United States v. Stevens. 2 WASHINGTON LEGISLATIVE OFFICE 15th Street, NW Washington, D.C. () Fax () Caroline Fredrickson Director Written Statement of the American Civil Liberties Union.

The Humane Society of the United States Vice President of Government Affairs Nancy Perry testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee at a hearing this week named 'Prohibiting Obscene Animal Crush Videos in the Wake of United States s.'Senator Jon Kyl, R-Ariz.

- who plans to introduce legislation with Sens. Jeff Merkley, D-Ore. and Richard Burr, R-N.C. to ban. United States v. Stevens at Adding a “Prurient Intent” Element written does not make it easy to distinguish obscene depictions of animal cruelty from other recognized categories of obscene speech.

Background Prohibiting Obscene Animal Crush Videos in the Wake of United States v. Stevens Before S. Comm. on the Judiciary. See Prohibiting Obscene Animal Crush Videos in the Wake of United States v.

Stevens: Hearing Before the S. Comm. on the Judiciary, th Cong. () (statement of J. Scott Ballenger, Partner, Latham & Watkins LLP) ("H.R.

does not spell out the full constitutional standard for obscenity under Miller. But neither do the rest of the. Senate Hearing “Prohibiting Obscene Animal Crush Videos in the Wake of United States v. Stevens,” Senate Committee on the Judiciary, Septem House Hearing on H.R.a Bill to Amend Ti United States Code, to Include Constrictor Snakes of the Species Python Genera as an Injurious Animal, U.S.

House of.The Senate Committee on the Judiciary held a hearing entitled “Prohibiting Obscene Animal Crush Videos in the Wake of United States s.”This hearing was an outgrowth of the U.S.

v. Stevens case, in which NSSF submitted an amicus brief and sounded the alarm about the case to the conservation world and outdoor media. The Supreme Court’s decision was based chiefly on the .United States v. Maurer, F.3d 72, 3rd Cir. () Autor Scribd Government Docs.

SENATE HEARING, TH CONGRESS - PROHIBITING OBSCENE ANIMAL CRUSH VIDEOS IN THE WAKE OF UNITED STATES v. STEVENS. Autor Scribd Government Docs. cv # Autor Equality Case Files. United States v. Daniel Sullivan, 3rd Cir. ().